Bush proposes different Social Security system for rich, poor | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Latest News

Bush proposes different Social Security system for rich, poor

Steven Thomma and Ron Hutcheson - Knight Ridder Newspapers

April 28, 2005 03:00 AM

WASHINGTON—President Bush looked to jumpstart his moribund effort to overhaul Social Security Thursday, proposing a two-tier system that would let benefits grow faster for poor people than for wealthier Americans.

"I believe a reformed system should protect those who depend on Social Security the most," Bush said in a prime-time news conference from the White House. "If you work hard and pay into Social Security your entire life, you will not retire into poverty."

Bush's proposal would let benefits grow as already promised for the poorest Americans but cut promised benefits for those making more. The proposal marked the first time Bush has offered any specific recommendation to change the retirement system since he proposed allowing younger workers to divert some of their taxes into private retirement accounts.

Bush's first prime-time news conference of his second term—and fourth of his presidency—suggested an attempt to regain momentum as he faces a daunting array of political problems threatening his agenda.

His 60-day campaign to pump up support for his proposal to partially privatize Social Security failed to do so. Polls show fewer people support his idea than before he started, and it is gaining no ground in Congress, where virtually all Democrats and some Republicans oppose it.

In addition, polls show Bush's job-approval rating is at an all-time low as public majorities oppose his handling of Social Security, energy policy, Iraq and the economy.

Sky-high gas prices are feeding public discontent and taking a toll on economic growth, which registered the weakest performance in two years during the first three months of this year, the Commerce Department announced Thursday. The latest data show the economy headed for a slowdown as inflation is rising, raising fears of `70s-style stagflation.

Adding to Bush's challenge were the television networks.

First, they forced him to move up the start time of his news conference to accommodate hit shows at the start of a ratings period. Then, even as Bush announced he was taking his last question because, "I don't want to cut into some of these TV shows that are getting ready to air," CBS, FOX and NBC cut him off to switch to their entertainment lineups.

Upbeat throughout his hour-long appearance in the White House East Room, Bush said he wasn't frustrated by his lack of progress in selling his agenda during the first hundred days of his second term.

"We're asking people to do things they haven't been doing for 20 years. ... I'm not surprised that some are balking at doing hard work," he said, adding that Congress hasn't enacted any changes in Social Security since 1983 and hasn't adopted an energy plan in "decades."

Nor was he ready to concede defeat. "We're just really getting started in the process," he said.

Bush insisted anew that he would negotiate almost any detail of a Social Security plan with Congress. He also insisted anew, however, that it include private accounts. Democrats have refused to negotiate on that and the partisan sniping resumed within minutes after Bush finished.

"All the president did tonight was confirm that he will pay for his risky privatization scheme by cutting the benefits of middle-class seniors," said a joint statement from Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada and Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, the top Democrats in Congress.

"It amazes me that leader Pelosi and the Democrats continue to criticize the president's proposals when they've offered no plan or ideas of their own," countered House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill. "Just yesterday, leader Pelosi blocked members of her party from attending a bipartisan meeting with Republicans and the AARP to discuss reforming Social Security."

Bush said the plan would solve most of the long-term cash flow problems for Social Security. White House aides said it would solve 70 percent of the problem.

Bush didn't specify who would get reduced benefits. One proposal he looked at would keep benefits rising as promised for the bottom 30 percent of wage earners while reducing them for the rest. But he said the income dividing line would have to be negotiated in Congress.

White House aides said Bush's proposal was modeled at least in part after a proposal from a Democratic mutual fund manager. Robert Pozen, chairman of Boston-based MFS Investment Management, briefed White House aides several weeks ago on his proposal to let benefits for poorer Americans continue to rise as scheduled. They are tied to the rise in wages.

But Pozen urged tying benefits for wealthier Americans to the rise in the inflation rate, which is smaller. Bush aides had been considering linking all benefits to the slower growing inflation rate. One argument for cutting benefits for wealthier Americans is that they already receive government help for retirement through tax breaks on their 401(k) investment accounts, which most poor people don't have.

On other issues, Bush pushed Congress to enact an energy policy, but he conceded that it wouldn't immediately affect gas prices.

"The energy bill is certainly no quick fix," he said. "You can't wave a magic wand. I wish I could."

Still, he said the country needs to take four steps to combat long-term high prices: improve conservation, find environmentally friendly ways to use existing sources of energy, develop new sources such as hydrogen and help developing countries such as China use energy more efficiently and thereby reduce their demand.

He lauded the House of Representatives for passing an energy bill and urged the Senate to do the same.

He also urged the Senate to allow an up-or-down vote on his stalled judicial nominations. But he disagreed with allies who've said Democrats are blocking some of those nominees because they oppose people of religious faith.

"I think people are opposing my nominees because they don't like the judicial philosophy of the people I've nominated," Bush said. "I don't ascribe a person's opposing my nominations to an issue of faith."

He brushed aside a question about a Pentagon observation that insurgency in Iraq remains as strong as a year ago. "I believe we're making really good progress in Iraq because the Iraqi people are beginning to see the benefits of a free society," he said.

Asked how he could reconcile claims of winning the war on terrorism with a new U.S. report showing that terrorist attacks last year reached a worldwide high, he suggested a short-term rise in casualties abroad was a necessary price.

"Well, we have made the decision to defeat the terrorists abroad, so we don't have to face them here at home," he said. "And when you engage the terrorists abroad, it causes activity and action."

Bush also expressed confidence in his embattled nominee to be ambassador to the United Nations, who has been accused of being abusive and belligerent to those he disagrees with.

"John Bolton is a blunt guy," Bush said, then suggested that bluntness could help him force changes in the international agency. "John Bolton can get the job done at the United Nations."

———

(c) 2005, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

PHOTOS (from KRT Photo Service, 202-383-6099): BUSH

GRAPHIC (from KRT Graphics, 202-383-6064): 20050428 BUSH poll

Need to map

Related stories from McClatchy DC

latest-news

1017184

May 24, 2007 04:04 AM

Read Next

Latest News

Republicans expect the worst in 2019 but see glimmers of hope from doom and gloom.

By Franco Ordoñez

December 31, 2018 05:00 AM

Republicans are bracing for an onslaught of congressional investigations in 2019. But they also see glimmers of hope

KEEP READING

MORE LATEST NEWS

Latest News

Trump administration aims to stop professional baseball deal with Cuba

December 29, 2018 02:46 PM

Latest News

No job? No salary? You can still get $20,000 for ‘green’ home improvements. But beware

December 29, 2018 08:00 AM

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

Congress

Does Pat Roberts’ farm bill dealmaking make him an ‘endangered species?’

December 26, 2018 08:02 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service