In Mexico, leading candidates hold different visions | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Latest News

In Mexico, leading candidates hold different visions

Alfonso Chardy - Knight Ridder Newspapers

June 07, 2006 03:00 AM

MEXICO CITY—Regardless of who won, one thing is clear after Tuesday night's Mexican presidential debate: The choice is now down to two candidates who offer starkly different visions of their country.

Only pro-business Felipe Calderon of the National Action Party, known by its Spanish initials as PAN, and leftist Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Party of the Democratic Revolution, or PRD, are serious contenders for voters' loyalties, an after-debate poll and interviews with people who watched the debate show.

The other major candidate, Roberto Madrazo of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, the PRI, at best will play the role of spoiler.

That marks a sea change in Mexican politics, which for most of the last century was dominated by the PRI, whose leaders often spouted leftist rhetoric but acted to protect business interests.

With Madrazo clearly not a contender, conservative and leftist forces are battling for control. Analysts said the new landscape recalled the years after independence from Spain, when conservatives and liberals fought continuously before the PRI emerged as a consensus force in the aftermath of the bloody 1910 revolution.

"For the first time in a century, the right and the left are again clearly defined as dominant political forces," said Sergio Aguayo, an El Colegio de Mexico professor and political analyst.

Pino Alberto Victoria Barrera, 39, a waiter at the Antiguo San Angel Inn restaurant in southern Mexico City, offered a similar assessment. "I felt that the only options left for Election Day are Calderon and Lopez Obrador," he said.

His comments were typical of more than 25 people Knight Ridder interviewed during and after the debate.

The biggest loser was Madrazo, Aguayo said, predicting that his supporters now will have to decide whether to vote for Calderon or Lopez Obrador. Those votes may well decide the election, he added.

"No one can anticipate which of the two will garner the bulk of dissatisfied PRI backers' votes," Aguayo said.

Tuesday was the first time Mexican voters had a chance to see Calderon, a former energy minister, and Lopez Obrador, a former mayor of Mexico City, on the same stage. Their performance promised that the final days of the campaign before the vote July 2 will be fiery.

Lopez Obrador accused Calderon of helping his brother-in-law profit from government contracts. Calderon blamed Lopez Obrador for Mexico City's huge debt.

The two men's proposals were as different as their backgrounds. Calderon, 43, is a Harvard-educated lawyer who served in the Cabinet of the current president, Vicente Fox, the PAN candidate who toppled the PRI in 2000.

Lopez Obrador, 53, is a former PRI state party leader who bolted from the party and served as Mexico City mayor under the PRD.

"What do the PAN people want?" Lopez Obrador asked rhetorically. "They want a government that continues to be a committee in the service of a few. What do we want? We want a government for everybody, that the fatherland be for all."

Calderon got personal in his closing statement: "The program you are putting forward is a danger to Mexico because it could lead to high debt and economic crisis."

There were three other candidates on the stage—Madrazo and representatives of two minor parties—but they were, in the words of El Universal reporter Martha Anaya, "diluted amid the fight."

Illegal immigration to the United States played a secondary role to issues of crime and corruption.

Calderon said he'd seek a "migratory accord" with Washington similar to a recently passed U.S. Senate bill that would grant legal status to undocumented migrants who'd spent more than five years in the United States.

Lopez Obrador said creating more jobs within Mexico would reduce illegal immigration.

A telephone poll published Wednesday in the Mexico City newspaper Reforma found that 44 percent of 408 people queried declared Calderon the winner, against 30 percent for Lopez Obrador. But the paper said there was no clear victor because 10 percent said they were unsure who'd won, and the survey's margin of error was plus or minus 4.8 percent.

The newspaper El Universal organized five focus groups in major cities around the country to watch the debate, then asked participants whom they preferred. Calderon outpolled Lopez Obrador in only one.

In the Mexico City group, with which a Knight Ridder reporter viewed the debate, about half the 25 attendees raised their hands when asked whether Lopez Obrador had won. Two raised their hands when was asked if Calderon had won. A few raised hands for the two other candidates, Patricia Mercado and Roberto Campa.

But none responded when Madrazo's name was called.

———

(c) 2006, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

PHOTOS (from KRT Photo Service, 202-383-6099): MEXICO-POLITICS

GRAPHICS (from KRT Graphics, 202-383-6064): 20060607 MEXICO bios and 20060607 MEXICO poll

Need to map

Related stories from McClatchy DC

latest-news

1031424

May 24, 2007 03:46 PM

Read Next

Latest News

No job? No salary? You can still get $20,000 for ‘green’ home improvements. But beware

By Kevin G. Hall

December 29, 2018 08:00 AM

A program called PACE makes it possible for people with equity in their homes to get easy money for clean energy improvements, regardless of income. But some warn this can lead to financial hardship, even foreclosure.

KEEP READING

MORE LATEST NEWS

Latest News

Trump administration aims to stop professional baseball deal with Cuba

December 29, 2018 02:46 PM

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

Congress

Does Pat Roberts’ farm bill dealmaking make him an ‘endangered species?’

December 26, 2018 08:02 AM

Congress

‘Remember the Alamo’: Meadows steels conservatives, Trump for border wall fight

December 22, 2018 12:34 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service