Bush threatens to veto `disastrous' withdrawal plan | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Latest News

Bush threatens to veto `disastrous' withdrawal plan

Renee Schoof - McClatchy Newspapers

March 28, 2007 03:00 AM

WASHINGTON—President Bush blamed Congress on Wednesday for putting a "disastrous" troop-withdrawal plan into a war-spending bill, threatened again to veto it and said Congress would feel heat from the public if war funds ran out.

Democrats responded that the $122 billion bill provides all the money Bush requested, plus more to restore the military and help those who are suffering the wounds of war. Democrats said Americans had lost faith in the president's handling of the war, offered to work with him on a new plan and suggested that the public will fault Bush if he vetoes the bill providing money for troops in the field.

The testy exchange came as the Senate prepared to vote this week on a war-spending bill similar to one that the House of Representatives passed last Friday. The Senate's bill requires that some American troops start to leave Iraq in four months and sets a goal for getting all combat troops out by March 31, 2008, except for a residual force that would stay to fight terrorists, train Iraqis and protect Americans.

The president said he'd veto the bill if it contained a timetable for withdrawing and non-emergency spending.

"Now, some of them believe that by delaying funding for our troops, they can force me to accept restrictions on our commanders that I believe would make withdrawal and defeat more likely. That's not going to happen," Bush said in a speech to the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. "If Congress fails to pass a bill to fund our troops on the front lines, the American people will know who to hold responsible."

Congress' Democratic leaders—Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California—said Bush should meet with lawmakers to work out differences. They wrote to him Wednesday seeking such a meeting.

"We stand ready to work with you, but your threats to veto a bill that has not even been presented to you indicate that you may not be ready to work with us. We hope that is not the case," Reid and Pelosi wrote.

At a news conference, Pelosi added: "I would extend a hand of friendship to the president, just to say to him: `Calm down with the threats. There is a new Congress in town. We respect your constitutional role; we want you to respect ours.'"

After the Senate passes its bill, a House-Senate conference committee will start to work out differences and craft a final version to send to the president for his signature or veto.

Pelosi suggested that Bush would face public criticism if he vetoed a bill providing war funds, money for veterans' and military health care, assistance to victims of Hurricane Katrina and other needs at home.

She said American troops were in the middle of a civil war that the Iraqi government wasn't doing enough to end. Congressional Democrats want to require Iraq's government to meet benchmarks of progress toward ending the violence and creating a government that represents all the country's ethnic and religious groups.

"In our legislation, we are saying we support our troops by funding the military. We honor our promises to our veterans, which we have not been doing, and we hold the Iraqi government accountable. This has not been happening," Pelosi said.

———

(c) 2007, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Iraq

Related stories from McClatchy DC

latest-news

1042233

May 24, 2007 05:00 PM

Read Next

Latest News

Republicans expect the worst in 2019 but see glimmers of hope from doom and gloom.

By Franco Ordoñez

December 31, 2018 05:00 AM

Republicans are bracing for an onslaught of congressional investigations in 2019. But they also see glimmers of hope

KEEP READING

MORE LATEST NEWS

Latest News

Trump administration aims to stop professional baseball deal with Cuba

December 29, 2018 02:46 PM

Latest News

No job? No salary? You can still get $20,000 for ‘green’ home improvements. But beware

December 29, 2018 08:00 AM

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

Congress

Does Pat Roberts’ farm bill dealmaking make him an ‘endangered species?’

December 26, 2018 08:02 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service