U.S. trade limits with Cuba to stay | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Latest News

U.S. trade limits with Cuba to stay

Pablo Bachelet - McClatchy Newspapers

July 29, 2007 03:17 PM

WASHINGTON — The House on Friday rejected an initiative to ease restrictions on U.S. agricultural exports to Cuba, virtually burying any chance that U.S. policy toward the island could be relaxed by Congress this year.

By a 245-182 margin, the House voted down an amendment presented by Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., that would have allowed Cuban officials to travel to the United States to inspect U.S. export facilities and products and let Cubans make direct payments to U.S. banks for any purchases.

The initiative, inserted as an amendment to a broader farm bill, would also have allowed the Cuban government to pay for goods after they are shipped from a U.S. port, rather than before as now required.

The vote is especially significant because opponents of the Bush administration's tough line on Cuba believed a powerful coalition of agricultural interests teamed with a Democratic majority in Congress would this year chip away at U.S. restrictions on trade with and travel to Cuba.

Proponents of change also hoped that the Democratic majority would be more skeptical of U.S. policies toward Havana, and that Fidel Castro's long illness would spur U.S. lawmakers to modify U.S. policies toward the communist government.

But these aspirations fell flat as Cuban-American lawmakers and their allies went on the offensive, arguing U.S. policy should not be changed until a democratic transition gets under way in Cuba. Last month, the House rejected a proposal to slash a Bush administration plan to boost aid to Cuban opposition groups, and declined to even allow amendment votes on travel restrictions, citing procedural reasons.

"The signal is very clear that the tables have turned on the Cuba debate in Congress," a jubilant Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., told The Miami Herald after the vote. "Our fears were not realized when people said now all pro-Castro amendments will be passed and totally change U.S.-Cuba policy."

"This vote was pivotal; this vote was monumental," she added. Opponents "could put up their amendments but now people are on record as supporting a path that is not economic engagement with a regime that oppresses its people."

The Cuban government has repeatedly complained that U.S. restrictions made it more expensive for Havana to purchase U.S. medicines and food products. In a speech Thursday, Raul Castro said the Bush administration has "acted with special viciousness" and called the financing requirements "an extraterritorial imposition of U.S. laws."

According to a recent report by the U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent government agency that studies trade-related issues, lifting some U.S. restrictions would boost U.S. exports to the island by between $176 million and $350 million.

U.S. food and medicines exports to Cuba have been permitted since 2000. American farmers became the largest suppliers of foodstuffs to Cuba in 2004. However, in recent years Cuban purchases have dipped. U.S. exports to the island totaled $338 million in 2006.

Cubans still rely on ration cards to buy many food items. Raul Castro has said the Cuban economy needs an overhaul to provide better livelihoods for its citizens, though he blames the hardships on the United States.

The ITC estimated that the restrictions the Rangel bill sought to overturn added between 2.5 percent and 10 percent to Cuba's cost of buying U.S. agricultural goods.

In the past, Cuban-American lawmakers and their allies declined to challenge agricultural amendments on Cuba in a floor vote because agriculture was a sensitive issue for lawmakers from farming communities, Ros-Lehtinen said. But she said Rangel "overreached" by adding banking and other provisions in his bill.

Rangel called his amendment "a real win for America, a real win for American farmers and a real win for democracy." He criticized the embargo as "truly ineffective" and said it had less to do with communism and more with Florida politics.

Opponents of the amendment argued the initiative would provide Cuba, deemed by the State Department as a state sponsor of terrorism, direct access to U.S. banks, and that Havana would use the visas for its inspectors to infiltrate spies into the United States.

The defeat is also significant because Rangel is the powerful chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, which oversees trade matters. Ros-Lehtinen credited Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., for swaying many Democrats on Cuba.

"She really pulled a lot of Democratic votes for us," Ros-Lehtinen said. "She was just a tiger on this bill."

On the floor debate, Wasserman Schultz said the amendment "needlessly adds a volatile political issue to this (agriculture) bill."

———

(c) 2007, The Miami Herald.

Visit The Miami Herald Web edition on the World Wide Web at http://www.herald.com/

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Read Next

Latest News

No job? No salary? You can still get $20,000 for ‘green’ home improvements. But beware

By Kevin G. Hall

December 29, 2018 08:00 AM

A program called PACE makes it possible for people with equity in their homes to get easy money for clean energy improvements, regardless of income. But some warn this can lead to financial hardship, even foreclosure.

KEEP READING

MORE LATEST NEWS

Latest News

Trump administration aims to stop professional baseball deal with Cuba

December 29, 2018 02:46 PM

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

Congress

Does Pat Roberts’ farm bill dealmaking make him an ‘endangered species?’

December 26, 2018 08:02 AM

Congress

‘Remember the Alamo’: Meadows steels conservatives, Trump for border wall fight

December 22, 2018 12:34 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service