Gonzales aide to invoke the Fifth in testimony | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

News

Gonzales aide to invoke the Fifth in testimony

Margaret Talev - McClatchy Newspapers

March 26, 2007 03:00 AM

WASHINGTON—A key aide to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will invoke the Fifth Amendment rather than answer lawmakers' questions about the firings of eight U.S. attorneys, her lawyer said Monday.

The decision by Monica Goodling to protect herself against self-incrimination marks the first instance in which a Bush administration appointee involved in the probe has signaled concerns about possible criminal repercussions.

Goodling, 33, has taken leave from her job as counsel to the attorney general and as the Justice Department's liaison to the White House.

Meanwhile, Gonzales went on national television Monday seeking to deflect criticism three days after a new release of e-mails showed that he had more involvement in the firings than he initially suggested.

"Nothing improper happened here," he said in an interview on NBC. "I've got nothing to hide in terms of what I've done. And we now want to reassure the American public that nothing improper happened here.

"Someday, when I leave this office," he said, "I am confident that I will leave with my integrity."

In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Goodling's lawyer, John M. Dowd, said that "the potential for legal jeopardy for Ms. Goodling from even her most truthful and accurate testimony under these circumstances is very real."

Leahy responded: "The American people are left to wonder what conduct is at the base of Ms. Goodling's concern that she may incriminate herself in connection with criminal charges if she appears before the committee under oath."

The panel's top Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, couldn't be reached for comment.

Rep. Adam Putnam of Florida, chairman of the House Republican Conference, called Goodling's decision "disturbing" and said it "reinforces individuals' worst thoughts about what may have been going on at the Justice Department."

At the same time, Putnam predicted that "almost any mid-level staffer who's hauled up here to testify in this kind of climate would be advised by their attorneys to protect themselves" from criminal charges.

Goodling's announcement came as the Senate Judiciary Committee prepares to call Gonzales' former chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, to testify later this week. Sampson's testimony on Thursday could be pivotal as lawmakers seek answers to the depth of Gonzales' and the White House's involvement and the reasons behind the personnel changes.

Sampson's attorney, Brad Berenson, said Monday that his client doesn't plan to invoke the Fifth Amendment or seek immunity. "Hearings in a highly politicized environment like this can sometimes become a game of gotcha, but Kyle has decided to trust the Congress and the process," Berenson said.

Lawmakers also want White House officials, including President Bush's political adviser Karl Rove, to testify. The White House has resisted so far, agreeing only to let officials answer limited questions privately with no transcript.

Also on Monday, the Justice Department's inspector general said in a letter to Leahy and Specter that he'd faced internal resistance in his decision to investigate the firings.

Inspector General Glenn Fine said Gonzales initially asked the Office of Professional Responsibility to conduct the investigation. When Fine told the OPR that he believed his office should conduct the investigation, OPR officials disagreed and asserted jurisdiction.

Chuck Rosenberg, interim chief of staff to Gonzales, had to intervene by asking both entities to jointly investigate.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino reaffirmed Bush's support for Gonzales on Monday, but tried to distance the White House from the controversial firings.

While U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, Democrats have accused the administration of retaliating against its independent prosecutors and possibly trying to interfere with corruption and voter fraud cases. The administration has denied any impropriety.

Justice Department e-mails collected by congressional investigators show that Goodling was involved in planning the dismissals and in efforts to limit the negative reaction. As liaison to the White House, she could shed light on the extent of White House involvement in the dismissals.

Other e-mails indicate that Goodling helped Gonzales and other top Justice Department officials prepare for congressional hearings into the firings. In February, she prepared a chart with information on the ousted prosecutors and their replacements.

Goodling took a leading role in making sure that Tim Griffin, a Rove protege, replaced H.E. "Bud" Cummins as the U.S. attorney in Arkansas. Documents released to Congress include communications between Goodling and Rove deputy Scott Jennings.

At Jennings' request, Goodling agreed to meet last summer with two Republican activists from New Mexico who felt that U.S. Attorney David Iglesias wasn't doing enough to pursue allegations of voter fraud by Democrats. Iglesias believes the issue was a key factor in his firing.

In his NBC interview, Gonzales sought to clarify his involvement in the firings.

Gonzales said he'd meant to say that he wasn't involved in the "deliberations over whether or not United States attorneys should resign."

Gonzales said he asked Sampson to coordinate a department review of the performance of the U.S. attorneys. He said he recalled Sampson mentioning that the White House had asked about the status of the underperformers.

"From time to time, Mr. Sampson would tell me something that would confirm in my mind that that process was ongoing," he said

Read Next

Latest News

Republicans expect the worst in 2019 but see glimmers of hope from doom and gloom.

By Franco Ordoñez

December 31, 2018 05:00 AM

Republicans are bracing for an onslaught of congressional investigations in 2019. But they also see glimmers of hope

KEEP READING

MORE NEWS

Midterms

Democrat calls for 48 witnesses at state board hearing into election fraud in NC

December 30, 2018 07:09 PM

Latest News

Trump administration aims to stop professional baseball deal with Cuba

December 29, 2018 02:46 PM

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Investigations

Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting

December 27, 2018 10:36 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service