Appeals court reopens patent challenge to Google’s Street View | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Courts & Crime

Appeals court reopens patent challenge to Google’s Street View

By Michael Doyle - McClatchy Washington Bureau

March 16, 2014 07:21 AM

Google must face a patent infringement challenge to its popular Street View application, a federal appellate court has ruled.

In the 14-page decision issued Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reopened the case brought by the California-based Vederi LLC. Vederi sued Google in October 2010, contending the latter had infringed on four patents. The four related patents, the court summarized, enable “ creating synthesized images of a geographic area through which a user may then visually navigate via a computer.”

Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting as trial judge, sided with Google in dismissing the challenge. He reasoned, in part, that Vederi’s method of taking, processing and displaying images creates only vertical flat views, not the spherical

ones for which Street View is known.

Try again, the appellate panel says.

The case, in part, revolved around the meaning of the term “ substantially” as a modifier in the text of the patent claims. In other words, this bears close reading.

David A. Dillard of Christie, Parker & Hale, of Glendale, Calif., argued the case for Vederi.

Read Next

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

By Emily Cadei

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

President Trump’s three picks to fill 9th Circuit Court vacancies in California didn’t get confirmed in 2018, which means he will have to renominate them next year.

KEEP READING

MORE COURTS & CRIME

Criminal Justice

Ted Cruz rallies conservatives with changes to criminal justice reform plan

December 06, 2018 01:51 PM

Congress

Kamala Harris aide resigns after harassment, retaliation settlement surfaces

December 05, 2018 07:18 PM

Congress

Felons may be back in the hemp farming business

December 05, 2018 04:08 PM

Investigations

‘This may be just the beginning.’ U.S. unveils first criminal charges over Panama Papers

December 04, 2018 07:27 PM

Criminal Justice

How a future Trump Cabinet member gave a serial sex abuser the deal of a lifetime

November 28, 2018 08:00 AM

Criminal Justice

Texas oilman Tim Dunn aims to broaden GOP’s appeal with criminal justice plan

November 20, 2018 04:25 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service