Questions abound over huge land purchase for Everglades | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

National

Questions abound over huge land purchase for Everglades

Curtis Morgan and Scott Hiaasen - Miami Herald

June 29, 2008 09:13 AM

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist called it the ''missing link'' — a huge swath of sugar fields south of Lake Okeechobee long coveted by environmentalists who hope to reconnect the lake with the Everglades.

But the reality is that getting water from the lake to the Everglades won't be easy, and the land that the state will take over in its $1.75 billion purchase of the U.S. Sugar Corp. will become not a flowing stream, but a massive patchwork of dammed reservoirs, pollution treatment marshes and diesel-burning pumps.

Water managers say that even when all that work is done the Everglades could end up losing more water than it gained.

Florida officials say the sugar fields are the key to salvaging the state-federal Everglades restoration plan. But they don't have any studies to show exactly how the plan would work. No one can say exactly how the 187,000 acres will be used or how much any future plans may ultimately cost. Also unknown: how long the deal may delay the already backlogged restoration effort.

Any reclamation of sugar fields must wait at least six years; that's how long U.S. Sugar will be allowed to operate — a deadline that could be extended.

Still, environmental groups say it's worth the wait, that the governor's proposal does what the original Everglades plan did not — it promises enough water storage south of Lake Okeechobee to revive the Glades.

Read the full story at MiamiHerald.com.

Read Next

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

By Emma Dumain

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Rep. Jim Clyburn is out to not only lead Democrats as majority whip, but to prove himself amidst rumblings that he didn’t do enough the last time he had the job.

KEEP READING

MORE NATIONAL

Elections

California Republicans fear even bigger trouble ahead for their wounded party

December 27, 2018 09:37 AM

Congress

‘Remember the Alamo’: Meadows steels conservatives, Trump for border wall fight

December 22, 2018 12:34 PM

National Security

Israel confounded, confused by Syria withdrawal, Mattis resignation

December 21, 2018 04:51 PM

Guantanamo

Did Pentagon ban on Guantánamo art create a market for it? See who owns prison art.

December 21, 2018 10:24 AM

Congress

House backs spending bill with $5.7 billion in wall funding, shutdown inches closer

December 20, 2018 11:29 AM

White House

Trump administration wants huge limits on food stamps — even though Congress said ‘no’

December 20, 2018 05:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service