Duke Energy compares coal prices from sheared-off mountains vs. mines | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

National

Duke Energy compares coal prices from sheared-off mountains vs. mines

Bruce Henderson - The Charlotte Observer

June 08, 2010 07:20 AM

Duke Energy is asking Appalachian coal suppliers to submit price estimates for coal mined by removing mountaintops — and prices for coal that isn't.

The request, the first by Duke, comes amid growing pressure from lawmakers and environmentalists to stop the practice of removing the earth above coal seams. The practice is cheaper and safer than underground mining, but can level mountain peaks while filling valleys with debris.

Duke said Monday its May 26 requests for coal-procurement proposals ask bidders for the information to help learn the price differences between the two types of coal.

Price is crucial because Duke is under state mandates to provide the cheapest possible electricity. The data from suppliers will help Duke determine financial impacts that may be reviewed by regulators, Duke spokesman Dave Scanzoni said.

Duke paid $1.2 billion last year for the 14 million tons of coal it burned in its eight Carolinas coal-fired power plants. The company typically spends about $3 billion a year for coal to supply its power plants in the Carolinas, Ohio, Kentucky and Indiana.

To read the complete article, visit www.charlotteobserver.com.

Read Next

White House

HUD delays release of billions of dollars in storm protection for Puerto Rico and Texas

By Stuart Leavenworth

January 04, 2019 03:45 PM

The Trump administration has delayed release of $16 billion in disaster mitigation funds, prompting complaints from Puerto Rico and Texas, which are worried about the approaching hurricane season.

KEEP READING

MORE NATIONAL

Congress

Mitch McConnell, ‘Mr. Fix It,’ is not in the shutdown picture

January 04, 2019 05:14 PM

Congress

Here’s when the government shutdown will hurt even more

January 04, 2019 03:25 PM

National

Perry Deane Young, NC-born Vietnam War correspondent and author, has died

January 03, 2019 01:48 PM

Congress

Delayed tax refunds. Missed federal paychecks. The shutdown’s pain keeps growing.

January 03, 2019 04:31 PM

Congress

Sharice Davids shows ‘respect’ for Pelosi’s authority on Congress’ first day

January 03, 2019 03:22 PM

Congress

Joe Cunningham votes no on Pelosi as speaker, backs House campaign head instead

January 03, 2019 12:25 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service