Judge in Alaska gives go-ahead for coal dust pollution suit | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

National

Judge in Alaska gives go-ahead for coal dust pollution suit

Elizabeth Bluemink - Anchorage Daily News

January 12, 2011 05:39 PM

ANCHORAGE — A federal judge this week allowed an environmental lawsuit involving coal-dust emissions in Seward to proceed in court.

In a 27-page ruling signed on Monday, Anchorage federal District Judge Tim Burgess denied motions by the Alaska Railroad and Aurora Energy Services to dismiss the case.

Two environmental groups are suing the companies over coal dust and debris that ends up in Resurrection Bay due to operations at the coal export terminal at the downtown Seward port. The railroad owns the terminal and Aurora, a firm affiliated with the Usibelli Coal Mine, operates it.

The groups, Alaska Community Action on Toxics and the state chapter of the Sierra Club, say the coal that ends up in the bay violates the Clean Water Act and has been a public health hazard in Seward for many years.

The companies argue they can't be sued under the Clean Water Act because the state is regulating coal dust from the Seward terminal under its air pollution rules.

In his ruling, Burgess said he might eventually be convinced that the coal emissions are not covered by the Clean Water Act, but at this point, "the Court cannot agree that the mere fact that the pollutants travel some distance through the air defeats liability."

Read Next

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

By Emma Dumain

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Rep. Jim Clyburn is out to not only lead Democrats as majority whip, but to prove himself amidst rumblings that he didn’t do enough the last time he had the job.

KEEP READING

MORE NATIONAL

Elections

California Republicans fear even bigger trouble ahead for their wounded party

December 27, 2018 09:37 AM

Congress

‘Remember the Alamo’: Meadows steels conservatives, Trump for border wall fight

December 22, 2018 12:34 PM

National Security

Israel confounded, confused by Syria withdrawal, Mattis resignation

December 21, 2018 04:51 PM

Guantanamo

Did Pentagon ban on Guantánamo art create a market for it? See who owns prison art.

December 21, 2018 10:24 AM

Congress

House backs spending bill with $5.7 billion in wall funding, shutdown inches closer

December 20, 2018 11:29 AM

White House

Trump administration wants huge limits on food stamps — even though Congress said ‘no’

December 20, 2018 05:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service