Rep. Brad Miller is raising questions about Bank of America's settlement with the government over soured mortgage-backed securities, asking whether the government got the best deal for taxpayers.
In a letter to the agency that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Miller and three other Democratic lawmakers asked for details on how the government reached settlements with Bank of America and Ally Financial over the repurchase of mortgage-backed securities. The settlements, announced by the government in a one-page news release on Jan. 3, were worth a total of $3.3 billion. Most of that - about $2.8 billion - came from Bank of America.
Since the fall, banks have been facing increasing pressure to repurchase mortgage-backed securities they sold to investors in the height of the housing boom. As these securities have soured, investors have asked banks to buy them back - at a loss for the banks. Fannie and Freddie's agreements with Bank of America and Ally could represent the first of many such deals between investors and banks.
In the letter to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, Miller and the others question whether the $3.3 billion settlement represents "the real liability" that Fannie and Freddie bear "as a result of the misrepresentations and breaches of warranty" by the two banks. "Specifically, we request information on how the FHFA determined that the combined $3.3 billion settlement represented the best possible recovery of funds available to taxpayers," the letter said. In addition to Miller, it was signed by Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts and Rep. Maxine Waters of California.
Read the complete story at charlotteobserver.com