DOT proposal to lower speed of oil trains would exclude smaller cities | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Economy

DOT proposal to lower speed of oil trains would exclude smaller cities

By Curtis Tate - McClatchy Washington Bureau

July 23, 2014 08:07 PM

The U.S. Department of Transporation’s plan to slow crude oil trains with older tank cars in urban areas would not apply to some of the cities where derailments have occurred or where officials and residents are worried they might.

The proposed rule on train speeds would require a 40 mph speed restriction in cities with more than 100,000 residents when a train contains any tank cars not meeting new safety requirements.

But DOT would measure city poulation by municipal boundaries, rather than metropolitan statistical area.

Such criteria would exclude Lynchburg, Va., population 78,000, the site of an April 30 crude oil train derailment where three tank cars fell into the James River. One of them breached, and the oil caught fire, prompting an evacuation of the city’s business district.

It would exclude Albany, N.Y., population 98,000, which has become a major transfer point for crude oil from rail to barge. Citing concerns about a string of oil train accidents, Albany County placed a moratorium on the expansion of such facilities earlier this year.

It also would exclude Bellingham, Wash., population 82,000, and Davis, Calif., population 66,000, both university towns where local officials and residents have expressed concerns about the safety and health impacts of increased crude oil shipments on rail lines that run through the community.

And to be sure, it would exclude Aliceville, Ala., and Casselton, N.D., which each have 2,400 residents who escaped serious harm when crude oil trains derailed in the past year, causing massive spills and fires.

DOT has set a 60-day public comment period for its proposals, and that may offer smaller cities a chance to weigh in. The rules the department proposed Wednesday reflect 152,000 comments it received.

Kevin Thompson, a spokesman for the Federal Railroad Administration, called public participation an essential part of the rulemaking process and said that the agency takes public comments seriously.

Crude oil trains are already restricted to 40 mph in 46 “High Threat Urban Areas” defined by the Department of Homeland Security, but many trains are going slower than that already.

For example, the Alton & Southern, a switching railroad in East St. Louis, Ill., has a maximum operating speed of 30 mph over its 22 miles of track. The railroad handles an average of 20 loaded crude oil trains a week, according to documents obtained through a state open records request.

Some local officials question the effectiveness of the speed restrictions.

Karen Darch, the village president of Barrington, Ill., who’s been a vocal advocate for rail safety improvements, noted that crude oil and ethanol trains have derailed at lower speeds than those DOT proposes.

Darch’s suburban Chicago community is criscrossed by busy rail lines that intersect with streets, and she said that lower train speeds could increase wait times at rail crossings for motorists and delay emergency vehicles.

“As we’ve found with this issue,” Darch said, “the devil is always in the details.”

Read Next

Video media Created with Sketch.

Policy

Are Muslim-owned accounts being singled out by big banks ?

By Kevin G. Hall and

Rob Wile

December 17, 2018 07:00 AM

Despite outcry several years ago, U.S. banks are back in the spotlight as more Muslim customers say they’ve had accounts frozen and/or closed with no explanation given. Is it discrimination or bank prudence?

KEEP READING

MORE ECONOMY

National

The lights are back on, but after $3.2B will Puerto Rico’s grid survive another storm?

September 20, 2018 07:00 AM

Investigations

Title-pawn shops ‘keep poor people poor.’ Who’s protecting Georgians from debt traps?

September 20, 2018 12:05 PM

Agriculture

Citrus disease could kill California industry if Congress slows research, growers warn

September 11, 2018 03:01 AM

Politics & Government

The GOP’s new attack: Democrats wants to ‘end’ Medicare

September 07, 2018 05:00 AM

Economy

KS congressman: Farmers are ‘such great patriots’ they’ll ride out Trump trade woes

August 30, 2018 02:17 PM

Midterms

Democrats’ fall strategy: Stop talking Trump

August 24, 2018 05:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service