Rights group condemns U.S., NATO air strikes in Afghanistan | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Politics & Government

Rights group condemns U.S., NATO air strikes in Afghanistan

James Rosen - McClatchy Newspapers

September 08, 2008 06:00 AM

WASHINGTON — U.S. and NATO air bombings in Afghanistan have killed more than 500 civilians since 2006, fueling a public backlash against the coalition's war effort, a prominent human rights group said Monday.

Human Rights Watch, an international organization based in New York, blamed some of the civilian deaths on Taliban and al Qaida insurgents who create "human shields" by blending into populated areas.

But the group also criticized mainly U.S. commanders for launching bombing raids under looser military "rules of engagement" than those followed by other NATO nations with troops in Afghanistan.

"The United States needs to end the mistakes that are killing so many civilians," said Brad Adams, Asia director for Human Rights Watch. "While Taliban shielding is a factor in some civilian deaths, the United States shouldn't use this as an excuse when it could have taken better precautions."

Though suicide bombings and other insurgent attacks have killed about twice as many civilians as U.S. and NATO missions, the air strikes launched mainly by Americans have caused deep resentment, the group said in a report released Monday.

Blair Jones, a White House spokesman, said U.S. military commanders exercise caution in Afghanistan.

"The United States takes steps to avoid civilian casualties in all its operations," Jones said. "As the report notes, the Taliban often use civilians as human shields to cover their activities against the Afghan people and Afghan government."

Jones added, "We grieve for every loss of life and will continue to take measures to avoid the deaths of innocent civilians."

A U.S. air strike July 6 killed 47 Afghans at a wedding in Nangahar province, and nine Afghan national police offices died in a U.S. bombing raid in Farah province two weeks later.

In response to an air strike two weeks ago, the Afghan government began a review of foreign troops' presence in the South Asia country.

"In winning the tactical battle quickly on the ground with bombs, U.S. and NATO forces risk losing the strategic battle for the support of the population, essential in counter-insurgency operations," the report said.

The U.S. willingness to employ air strikes when its troops aren't under direct attack prompt concerns that Washington is snubbing its obligations under the Geneva Conventions and other international laws of war, Human Rights Watch said.

Lt. Col. Mark Wright, a Pentagon spokesman, said Taliban and other insurgent forces often attack U.S. troops from inside civilian homes.

"Every death of a civilian in wartime is a terrible tragedy," Wright said. "That being said, U.S. forces are in Afghanistan to support the Afghan people and their government."

The number of overall Afghan civilian deaths in the war, which the United States launched in October 2001 after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, rose from 929 in 2006 to 1,633 last year, according to the Human Rights Watch report.

About 540 civilians died in the first seven months of this year, the report said, which projects to a 2008 total of 926 — almost exactly the 2006 figure.

Coalition air strikes killed 556 civilians between the start of 2006 and the end of this July, while 530 died in U.S. and NATO ground attacks.

Some NATO officials told the human rights group's analysts that the United States, which controls most of the sky over Afghanistan, relies too much on air power.

"Some Afghans think the United States is worse than the Russians," one ambassador in Kabul, the nation's capital, told the group.

The Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan from 1979 to 1989 and controlled a Communist puppet government there for three years after its military forces withdrew.

There are 42,550 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, with 23,550 operating under NATO control and 19,000 in direct U.S. control as part of Operation Enduring Freedom.

Violence in Afghanistan

More than 3,000 civilians have died since 2006 in the Afghanistan war, nearly two-thirds of them in attacks launched by Taliban or al Qaida insurgents. Mainly U.S. airstrikes have killed almost half of the civilians slain in assaults by U.S. and NATO forces.

2008 (through July)

Total civilian deaths: 540

In insurgent attacks: 367

In U.S./NATO attacks: 173

In U.S./NATO airstrikes: 119

2007

Total civilian deaths: 1,633

In insurgent attacks: 950

In U.S./NATO attacks: 683

In U.S./NATO airstrikes: 321

2006

Total civilian deaths: 929

In insurgent attacks: 699

In U.S./NATO attacks: 230

In U.S./NATO airstrikes: 116

Source: Human Rights Watch

Related stories from McClatchy DC

world

Afghanistan surpasses Iraq as deadliest spot for U.S. troops

July 29, 2008 04:44 PM

world

Sending more troops to Afghanistan could backfire, experts say

July 25, 2008 07:04 PM

politics-government

Busy in Iraq, U.S. faces surging violence in Afghanistan

April 15, 2008 04:43 PM

Read Next

Video media Created with Sketch.

Midterms

Democrat calls for 48 witnesses at state board hearing into election fraud in NC

By Brian Murphy and

Carli Brosseau

December 30, 2018 07:09 PM

Democrat Dan McCready’s campaign listed 48 witnesses for the state board of elections to subpoena for a scheduled Jan. 11 hearing into possible election fraud in North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District.

KEEP READING

MORE POLITICS & GOVERNMENT

Latest News

Trump administration aims to stop professional baseball deal with Cuba

December 29, 2018 02:46 PM

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Investigations

Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting

December 27, 2018 10:36 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

Elections

California Republicans fear even bigger trouble ahead for their wounded party

December 27, 2018 09:37 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service