South Carolina's Graham, DeMint part ways on Kagan | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Politics & Government

South Carolina's Graham, DeMint part ways on Kagan

James Rosen - McClatchy Newspapers

August 05, 2010 09:09 PM

WASHINGTON — Sens. Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint on Thursday offset each other's votes on Solicitor General Elena Kagan's Supreme Court nomination, with Graham backing her to become the third sitting female justice and DeMint opposing her.

The Senate confirmed Kagan by a 63-37 margin that largely followed party lines. Graham joined four other Republicans in voting for her; DeMint was one of 37 GOP senators to oppose her, along with Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska.

"My view of Elena Kagan is quite simple," Graham said on the Senate floor before the vote. "I found her to be a good, decent person — well qualified in terms of her legal background to sit on the court."

The outcome marked the second time in a year that Graham and DeMint, both South Carolina Republicans, parted ways in voting on a high court nominee by President Barack Obama.

Graham had more GOP company in the Aug. 6, 2009, Senate vote to confirm Sonia Sotomayor as the first Hispanic justice. He was among nine Republicans who supporter her.

Graham and DeMint expressed widely divergent views of their constitutional roles as senators in exercising the founding document's "advice and consent" oversight of presidential nominations.

DeMint, heavily favored to win his second Senate term in November, criticized Kagan as a liberal activist jurist willing to bend constitutional principles to suit her political agenda.

"I oppose Ms. Kagan's nomination because she, in my opinion, does not believe in constitutional limited government," DeMint said before the vote. "She does not believe in the original intent of the Constitution."

Graham, a military lawyer, said it was Obama's prerogative to choose a justice who reflects his political views.

"Her views are well to the left of me and my views," Graham told McClatchy after the vote. "But under both the constitutional and historical standards of Supreme Court confirmations, my vote is not supposed to be based on whether I, as a senator, agree with the nominee.

With Kagan's elevation, three of the nine Supreme Court justices are women for the first time in U.S. history. In addition to Obama's two picks, Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the high court in 1993 after her nomination by President Bill Clinton.

Graham noted that the late Sen. Strom Thurmond, the long-serving South Carolina Republican he succeeded in the Senate, voted to confirm Ginsburg.

Kagan, a 50-year-old former Harvard Law School dean, had a joke-filled series of exchanges with Graham during her Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last month, when he was the only Republican on the panel to vote to confirm her.

"Choosing a liberal lawyer from a president who campaigned and governs from the left is not a wrong reason" for Kagan to sit on the Supreme Court, Graham said.

"The wrong reason would be if the person you chose was not worthy of the job, did not have the background or the moral character to administer justice. I cannot find fault with Elena Kagan using that standard," he said.

Related stories from McClatchy DC

HOMEPAGE

The Supreme Court's official website

April 20, 2010 07:59 AM

national

Kagan wins Senate confirmation to Supreme Court, 63-37

August 05, 2010 04:16 PM

politics-government

Democrat Nelson to oppose Kagan; GOP's Gregg to vote yes

July 30, 2010 09:22 PM

politics-government

Graham only GOP senator on panel to vote for Kagan

July 20, 2010 05:14 PM

Read Next

Video media Created with Sketch.

Midterms

Democrat calls for 48 witnesses at state board hearing into election fraud in NC

By Brian Murphy and

Carli Brosseau

December 30, 2018 07:09 PM

Democrat Dan McCready’s campaign listed 48 witnesses for the state board of elections to subpoena for a scheduled Jan. 11 hearing into possible election fraud in North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District.

KEEP READING

MORE POLITICS & GOVERNMENT

Latest News

Trump administration aims to stop professional baseball deal with Cuba

December 29, 2018 02:46 PM

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Investigations

Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting

December 27, 2018 10:36 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

Elections

California Republicans fear even bigger trouble ahead for their wounded party

December 27, 2018 09:37 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service