House names Waxman to energy post, signaling change | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Congress

House names Waxman to energy post, signaling change

Rob Hotakainen - McClatchy Newspapers

November 20, 2008 06:38 PM

WASHINGTON — In a move that marks a sea change in the nation's environmental politics, California Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman on Thursday dethroned a champion of the auto industry from a top job in the House of Representatives.

Rebuking their most senior member, House Democrats voted 137-122 to oust Michigan Rep. John Dingell, 82, as the head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which will oversee climate change issues in the new Congress.

It means that two Californians will take leading roles in the debate. Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer is the head of the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, which has jurisdiction over the issue.

Boxer, who wants to force industries to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases, called the vote "momentous" and predicted that Waxman, who has close ties to environmentalists and to Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, "will be a great chairman."

"For me, as a Californian . . . I could not, frankly, have a better partner," said Boxer, calling the 69-year-old Waxman "a very, very, very strong" ally. With Barack Obama headed for the White House, she said, Washington will have all of the players in place to move aggressively on reducing global warming: "It's going to be a great year."

Dingell's backers were fuming that Democrats would throw out a veteran committee chairman simply because they disagreed with his political philosophy, calling it a blow to their long-established seniority system. Dingell, however, the top Democrat on the committee for nearly 28 years, congratulated Waxman and promised to work with him "for a smooth transition."

"Well, this was clearly a change year," said Dingell, who came to Congress in 1955 to take his late father's place.

Dingell, who's resisted higher fuel standards and tighter limits on greenhouse gases, had called Waxman an "anti-manufacturing left-wing Democrat" and said it would be a mistake to have him in charge of the committee, particularly with the auto industry struggling.

Democrats said the showdown between Waxman and Dingell — which took place behind closed doors — was one of the most intense they'd witnessed.

"It was sort of like Zeus and Thor, these two powerful people throwing lightning around the room," said California Democratic Rep. George Miller, an ardent environmentalist who'd backed Waxman and urged his colleagues to do so. "You're asking people how they're going to vote and most people say, 'I just want to get out of the way. I don't want to get hit by this stuff.' It took a while to settle down."

Miller said that one of the main reasons Dingell lost was that he and President George W. Bush led the effort "to get rid of California's clean-air standards."

North Carolina Democratic Rep. Melvin Watt, who voted for Dingell, said that House Democrats were opening the door to appointing other top positions based on issues such as friendship, political donations and ideology. He said that could lead to "substantial problems going forward" for the majority party.

"I just thought it was a mistake, without having concrete and compelling reasons, to start disregarding the seniority system," Watt said. "We need a more concrete standard than popularity. . . . The best person is in the eye of the beholder, and the most senior person is not."

David Schultz, who teaches political science and election law at Hamline University in St. Paul, Minn., said that Dingell's ouster and Obama's election made the current leadership in Washington the most pro-environment since the early 1970s. That's when Congress teamed up with President Richard Nixon to create the Environmental Protection Agency, pass the Clean Water Act and create air quality, auto emission and anti-pollution standards.

"We're looking at a new Congress that, in spite of where the economy is, the environment is going to be front and center," Schultz said.

The vote came only hours before Congress dealt another blow to Michigan, the epicenter of the nation's auto industry. Not only did the industry lose one of its top allies in Dingell, but legislative leaders also announced that an effort to bail out the industry financially had stalled, forcing them back to the drawing board.

House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio said the vote by Democrats "sends a troubling signal from a majority that has promised to govern from the center." He called Dingell a "skilled and principled" chairman.

"They moved away from Chairman Dingell because he is committed to approaching energy and environmental issues in a manner that protects American jobs," Boehner said. "It is a disturbing sign that the leaders of the next Congress will be making decisions based not on what is best for the country, but for well-funded special interests whose priorities are far different from those of the vast majority of Americans."

Boxer said she'd introduce two environmental bills when the new Congress convened in January. The first would create a $15 billion-a-year grant program to reduce global warming emissions, an attempt to spur innovations in clean energy, including biofuels. The second would order the EPA to set up a so-called "cap and trade system" for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.

(Barbara Barrett contributed to this article.)

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Why the U.S. blinked on its troop agreement with Iraq

Obama calls on his Internet campaign army to march again

Congress won't help Detroit now, but may try later

Stevens bids his Senate colleagues farewell

Read Next

Congress

’I’m not a softy by any means,’ Clyburn says as he prepares to help lead Democrats

By Emma Dumain

December 28, 2018 09:29 AM

Rep. Jim Clyburn is out to not only lead Democrats as majority whip, but to prove himself amidst rumblings that he didn’t do enough the last time he had the job.

KEEP READING

MORE CONGRESS

Courts & Crime

Trump will have to nominate 9th Circuit judges all over again in 2019

December 28, 2018 03:00 AM

Congress

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

Elections

California Republicans fear even bigger trouble ahead for their wounded party

December 27, 2018 09:37 AM

Congress

Does Pat Roberts’ farm bill dealmaking make him an ‘endangered species?’

December 26, 2018 08:02 AM

Congress

Ted Cruz’s anti-Obamacare crusade continues with few allies

December 24, 2018 10:33 AM

Congress

‘Remember the Alamo’: Meadows steels conservatives, Trump for border wall fight

December 22, 2018 12:34 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service