Jared Kushner, a senior adviser to President Trump, has drawn a second fine for late filing of required disclosure forms. Pablo Martinez Monsivais AP
">

For example, they assigned different values to a partial stake in a Monmouth, N.J. shopping center with Trump listing the value as less than $1,001 and Kushner listing the value as exceeding $1 million. In May, Kushner sold a stake in this mall for as much as $500,000, but that doesn’t appear to account for the entirety of the discrepancy.

“I can’t think of a good reason why they would differ drastically,” said Matthew Sanderson, a campaign finance lawyer in Washington.

In response to questions, a White House official said that "it is a commonly accepted fact in the real estate industry that minority interests in a building are worth much less when they are sold individually, and not as part of the sale of the property as a whole.” More specifically, the official said, “Jared had held his stake [in the shopping center] as part of a cohesive ownership structure, and the value reflected that. When he separately sold his individual interest, a standard discount was applied to the value to reflect that he was selling a minority interest."

In addition, the complex structure of many of the Kushner Companies’ real estate transactions makes it hard to know whether some deals should have been listed on the couple’s ethics forms.

Neither Trump nor Kushner, for example, listed a $345 million piece of real estate in Brooklyn purchased partially by the Kushner Companies in December 2016, according to a New York City Department of Finance document.

A White House official familiar with the transaction but not authorized to speak publicly as a matter of practice said that neither Kushner nor the trusts controlled by his family had ownership interests in the property, and the reporting requirement is triggered by ownership. Public real estate and corporate documents relating to the deal don’t provide clarity on the matter.

As Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump’s paperwork mistakes continue to pile up, it is harder and harder to believe this is all a series of accidents.

Harrell Kirstein, a spokesman at American Bridge 21st Century

"Confidence in government is largely based on this notion that you don’t have a conflict" of interest, said Meredith McGehee, chief of policy, programs and strategy at Issue One, and is undermined when the financial disclosure statements that are meant to reveal those conflicts are opaque or unclear. “The lack of confidence erodes the notion of democracy and rots the core of self-government.”

Under federal law, when those who are required to file financial disclosure statements are more than 30 days late doing so they must pay a fine of $200, payable to the U.S. Treasury. The late fee can be waived if the White House’s ethics officer determines that the tardy filing was due to “extraordinary circumstances . . . which made the delay reasonably necessary,” including the agency’s failure to notify a worker of the need to file the disclosure report.

Kushner has also filed at least five periodic transaction reports — notifications that he has bought or sold stocks or other assets, according to the documents. These transaction reports are considered late if they’re filed more than 45 days after a purchase or sale; typically, a $200 fine is levied after another 30-day grace period.

It’s in connection with these reports that Kushner has drawn fines. The most recent was assessed on Aug. 28 by the White House under Office of Government Ethics rules. Kushner reported the March sale of undeveloped real estate in Jersey City for an amount between $1 million and $5 million — more than five months after it occurred. The earlier fine involved a transaction that occurred in February involving JCK Cadre LLC, a real estate investment company.

Trump’s form explaining the fine was not immediately available, but she incurred a fee for the same report, according to the White House official. Both Kushner and Trump will pay the fines, the official said.

Late fees are relatively rare; they were assessed on just 3.6 percent of the more than 12,000 periodic transaction reports filed by federal government employees in 2016, according to an OGE survey of all executive branch agencies.