Commentary: Supreme Court should reinforce rules for free speech | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Supreme Court should reinforce rules for free speech

The Miami Herald

November 10, 2008 10:49 AM

This editorial appeared in The Miami Herald.

In a moment of celebratory exuberance at the 2003 Golden Globe Awards, the rock star Bono exclaimed: "This is really, really f---ing brilliant!" It is fair to say that no one at the ceremony, nor those who watched on television, thought that Mr. Bono was talking about a "sexual or excretory" function. A majority of Federal Communications Commissioners, however, deemed the comment indecent - and went to battle.

As a result, a solemn assembly of U.S. Supreme Court justices spent much of the day Tuesday listening to expensive lawyers discuss the infinite nuances of curse words. Yes, they did. Really and truly.

We would think that the Supreme Court justices could find better use of their time and brainpower. Nonetheless, an FCC decision carries a good deal of clout - and the court's judgment on Mr. Bono's excited comment will set the boundaries for what is acceptable language on broadcast radio and television. So the justices dutifully weighed the lawyers' arguments about whether the word s---, for example, always conveys an excretory function, or is simply a foul exclamation.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Miami Herald.

Related stories from McClatchy DC

politics-government

Supreme Court debates 'F-word' without using it

November 04, 2008 01:39 PM

politics-government

Supreme Court arguments will focus on naughty words

October 31, 2008 02:51 PM

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service