Commentary: Texas needs better options for redistricting | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Texas needs better options for redistricting

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram

December 16, 2008 01:43 PM

This editorial appeared in The Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

Lost in all the post-election consternation over California voters' approval of Proposition 8, which bans gay marriage, was their passage of Proposition 11, a redistricting milestone.

The measure appeared to have passed narrowly when vote counting was completed the first week of December. It sets up a bipartisan commission of 14 residents — five Democrats, five Republicans and four people not registered with either party — to draw districts for electing members of the state Legislature after the once-a-decade census.

This didn't include a provision for mapping congressional districts by an independent commission. But it's more evidence voters can be convinced that there's a better way to draw voting districts than leaving it to politicians whose self-interest conflicts directly with the best interests of the electorate.

Lawmakers, after all, want to protect their turf, or, at the very least, their jobs. The parties to which they belong want to protect their power, if they've got it.

The passage of Proposition 11 is encouraging because it suggests that voters elsewhere might be persuaded to accept what at least a majority of Californians did: Representative government sometimes can be enhanced only by reducing lawmakers' influence.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service