Commentary: Making 'organic" label have meaning | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Making 'organic" label have meaning

The Sacramento Bee

January 07, 2009 11:53 AM

This editorial appeared in The Sacramento Bee.

Californians are passionate about the term "organic," which is why many of them pay a premium price for foods grown with no synthetic fertilizers or pesticides.

Consumers of organic agriculture support a growing $24 billion national industry that has a major presence here in California. But they do so only because they assume that government and growers are watching out for what they buy.

That faith has been badly shaken by revelations reported by The Bee's Jim Downing in a Dec. 28 story. Through open records requests, Downing learned that the state Department of Food and Agriculture had caught a California manufacturer spiking its organic fertilizer with chemicals but didn't act against the company for more than two years.

According to Downing's reporting, agriculture department inspectors learned from a whistleblower in June 2004 that California Liquid Fertilizer, based in Salinas, was adding ammonium sulfate to a fertilizer that was supposed to be made from fish and chicken waste.

At the time, the company was a fast-growing manufacturer of organic fertilizer. Within two years, it would control a third of the state's market, supplying big organic producers such as Earthbound and Tanimura & Antle.

Despite the stakes involved, it took a year for a state inspector to sample and test the company's leading product. Further tests found more ammonium sulfate in the company's fertilizer.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Sacramento Bee.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service