Commentary: 'Alcopop" makers trying to pull a fast one | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: 'Alcopop" makers trying to pull a fast one

January 15, 2009 01:16 PM

This editorial appeared in The Fresno Bee.

Alcohol industry execs must be celebrating, perhaps clinking bottles of Mike's Hard Lemonade or Smirnoff Ice. That's because they pulled a fast one on California tax officials, the Legislature, the governor and the public.

By changing the way they formulate their flavored malt beverages (called "alcopops," they're soda-pop-tasting alcohol drinks popular with teenagers), the industry has been able to avoid a substantial tax increase imposed last year by the State Board of Equalization. It also escaped tough new labeling rules passed by the Legislature.

Distilled spirits, like bourbon and Scotch, are taxed at a rate of $3.30 a gallon; wine and beer are taxed at 20 cents a gallon. Flavored malt beverages had been taxed at the lower rate because they contained about the same amount of alcohol as beer.

But they also contain a trace amount of distilled spirits often found in the flavoring, so the Board of Equalization decided – after lobbying by anti-teen-drinking groups – that "alcopops" should be assessed the higher rate.

A higher tax would make them less affordable to young consumers and help reduce the incidence of drunken driving and binge drinking.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Fresno Bee.

Related stories from McClatchy DC

HOMEPAGE

More commentary from The Fresno Bee

December 09, 2008 10:54 AM

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service