Commentary: California must stop scaremongering in prison overcrowding ruling | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: California must stop scaremongering in prison overcrowding ruling

The Sacramento Bee

February 11, 2009 11:13 AM

This editorial appeared in The Sacramento Bee.

The wholly predictable outcome to California's refusal to address prison overcrowding has occurred.

A panel of three federal judges has tentatively ruled that the only remaining course to fix unconstitutional prison conditions is to reduce or limit the prison population.

California has reached this juncture because its political branches – the governor and Legislature – have utterly failed to come up with a solution.

This abdication of duty has thrown the responsibility for action onto the court system.

With their tentative ruling, the judges have given Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislators another chance to act. But don't hold your breath. The first words from the Schwarzenegger administration were that the state would appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court if the judges make their ruling final.

Rather than resorting to legal back flips, gyrations and contortions, Schwarzenegger and legislators should get down to real negotiations toward a settlement.

Schwarzenegger, you'll recall, declared a state of emergency in 2006 because of "severe overcrowding" in the prisons, which he said caused "substantial risk to the health and safety of the men and women who work inside these prisons and the inmates housed in them." As the judges point out, "The governor's declaration of the state of emergency remains in effect to this day."

To read the complete editorial, visit The Sacramento Bee.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service