Commentary: A trade war over trucks is unnecessary | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: A trade war over trucks is unnecessary

The Sacramento Bee

March 26, 2009 11:53 AM

This editorial appeared in The Sacramento Bee.

Buried in last year's overdue federal spending bill was a provision that could start an altogether unnecessary trade war with Mexico – with big effects on California.

Fifteen years ago, the United States pledged in the North American Free Trade Agreement to allow the free flow of commerce with Canada and Mexico.

A big hangup has continued to be long-haul trucking between the United States and Mexico. Before NAFTA, Mexican trucks could cross the border, but the cargo had to be offloaded and sit around until a U.S. driver and truck could pick it up – a cumbersome, time-consuming process that cost a lot of money. NAFTA was supposed to change that.

But the Teamsters union complained that Mexican trucks didn't meet U.S. safety standards. So cross-border trucking that was supposed to begin with California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas in 1995 was delayed until stringent safety and security programs could be established.

Those safety and security measures are now in place – and a successful 18-month pilot program with 100 Mexican carriers and 1,000 trucks has shown that they work. Trucks and drivers from Mexico must meet U.S. safety requirements. They pay the same fuel taxes and registration fees as U.S. truckers. They must be insured by a U.S.-licensed insurance company. The trucks have been manufactured to meet both U.S. and Mexican emissions standards.

The drivers must have a valid commercial driver's license, understand and respond in English, and undergo drug and alcohol testing.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Sacramento Bee.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service