Commentary: NATO's response to Afghanistan is tepid at best | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: NATO's response to Afghanistan is tepid at best

The Kansas City Star

April 08, 2009 11:47 AM

This editorial appeared in The Kansas City Star.

Only a few weeks ago, Obama administration officials expected NATO to strongly support plans to boost troop totals in Afghanistan.

But it was not to be. During their weekend summit, NATO allies pledged only 5,000 new troops for the war, a pale contrast to President Obama's recent decision to order a U.S. troop surge of 21,000. Of the European troops promised, most will be deployed just temporarily to provide security for Afghan elections set for August.

NATO's decision is a sad comment on the state of the Atlantic alliance on its 60th anniversary – and a reminder to the administration that glowing reviews of the president's style don't necessarily translate to concrete results.

After Sept. 11, NATO agreed to help with the war effort in Afghanistan. But from the beginning most of the real combat has fallen to the United States, backed by Britain, Canada, Australia and a few others.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Kansas City Star.

Related stories from McClatchy DC

opinion

Commentary: 'Afghanistan is about to become Mr. Obama's war'

April 02, 2009 08:00 AM

opinion

Commentary: A way forward in Afghanistan

March 26, 2009 09:50 AM

HOMEPAGE

More commentary by The Kansas City Star

December 15, 2008 02:04 PM

Read Next

Opinion

A preview of 2019 and a few New Year’s resolutions for Trump and Pelosi

By Andrew Malcolm Special to McClatchy

January 02, 2019 06:00 AM

The president might resolve to keep his mouth shut some and silencing his cellphone more this year. Pelosi too could work on her public speaking and maybe use notes a bit more to remind of the subject at hand.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The West has long militarized space. China plans to weaponize it. Not good.

December 27, 2018 04:52 PM

Opinion

Trump’s artless deal: The president’s Syria decision will have long-term consequences

December 26, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service