Commentary: California gets burned by wildfires' cost | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: California gets burned by wildfires' cost

The Sacramento Bee

April 22, 2009 11:08 AM

This editorial appeared in The Sacramento Bee.

In the third year of a statewide drought, California faces increasing risk of wildfire. That's why it is important to control new housing development in wildfire zones.

The reality is that year after year, cities and counties approve new subdivisions in remote canyons and forests in high fire-hazard zones without ensuring adequate local fire protection. They assume that outside firefighters will help when disaster strikes – costing the state more than $300 million a year.

Assemblyman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento, has introduced Assembly Bill 666 that would do for fire-prone areas what the state already does for flood-prone areas. Just as new developments in flood-prone areas have to show adequate flood protection, new developments in fire-prone areas would have to show adequate fire protection.

Jones' bill would require counties faced with projects in fire-prone areas to:

• Certify that sufficient fire protection services are available through the county, city, special district, or through contracts with the state Department of Forestry and Fire Protection;



• Follow state fire regulations on roads, turnarounds, defensible space and emergency water systems;



To read the complete editorial, visit The Sacramento Bee.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service