Commentary: Sanford's solution lacks long-term thinking | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Sanford's solution lacks long-term thinking

Cindi Ross Scoppe - The State

April 27, 2009 01:19 PM

If your doctor said you had two years to live, would you reply, "Just shoot me now"?

Outlandish question? OK. If your boss told you she would have to lay you off in two years, would you pack up your things and walk out the door?

You've no doubt figured out by now where I'm going, but the analogy is still not quite right. Try this: Would you quit on the spot if your boss said he would have to lay you off in two years unless the economy really picked up between now and then?

Of course not. You'd start searching for another job, perhaps, or taking some college courses, or look into starting your own business. But unless or until you found something else, you would keep your job, because being able to put food on the table and pay the mortgage for a couple of more years is pretty valuable to most of us.

Not to Mr. Sanford, who noted the other week that all those teachers who are complaining that they're going to be laid off in a few weeks if he doesn't request federal stimulus funds would just get laid off two years from now anyway when that money runs out if he did.

On the facing page, Mr. Sanford charges that House Speaker Bobby Harrell – and by implication nearly every elected Republican in the state and, as far as I can tell, every newspaper, most of the independents who are essential to putting Republicans into office and a growing number of rank-and-file Republicans – just doesn't understand the danger of spending money that the federal government is borrowing in an attempt to stimulate the economy.

But we do understand that – quite well.

Most of us have serious qualms about the stimulus package, but we understand that the Congress has already made the decision to borrow money to try to revive the economy. We understand that South Carolinians will have to help repay the ever-growing federal deficit, whether we get one penny of the borrowed money or not. We understand that, contrary to Mr. Sanford's assurances, the money designated for our state will in fact go elsewhere if Mr. Sanford does not request it. Perhaps not today, or even this year, but eventually.

It is Mr. Sanford who does not understand. Either that – and I hesitate even to bring up this possibility because the idea is so horrid – or he does not care. He doesn't understand, or care, that our economy is in a self-perpetuating downward spiral that will continue either until some outside force breaks the fall or it hits a bottom much lower than we can imagine. He doesn't understand, or care, that receiving a paycheck for the next two years is a big deal for a lot of South Carolinians – and that whether those South Carolinians continue to receive those paychecks and spend the money in their communities is a big deal for our economy.

To read the complete column, visit www.thestate.com.

Read Next

Opinion

A preview of 2019 and a few New Year’s resolutions for Trump and Pelosi

By Andrew Malcolm Special to McClatchy

January 02, 2019 06:00 AM

The president might resolve to keep his mouth shut some and silencing his cellphone more this year. Pelosi too could work on her public speaking and maybe use notes a bit more to remind of the subject at hand.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The West has long militarized space. China plans to weaponize it. Not good.

December 27, 2018 04:52 PM

Opinion

Trump’s artless deal: The president’s Syria decision will have long-term consequences

December 26, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service