Commentary: Obama's inaction on Yucca Mountain | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Obama's inaction on Yucca Mountain

The Tri-City Herald

June 24, 2009 02:35 PM

As we have seen with his handling of some bailout funds and with the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, President Obama has not allowed his presidency to become a prisoner of his campaign.

At least not entirely.

But there is at least one exception, where sticking by his campaign promise is stifling economic and energy progress in this and 38 other states.

Yucca Mountain.

Candidate Obama gave nuclear power only an "on second thought" consideration, and that tepid support was chilled by his campaign pledge to end the Yucca Mountain project.

Maybe Yucca Mountain isn't the perfect solution to store nuclear wastes from Hanford, other Department of Energy sites and the nation's commercial nuclear power plants, including Energy Northwest's reactor in north Richland.

But it doesn't have to be perfect, only safe. Billions of public dollars have been spent on scientific research aimed at answering the safety question.

By the time the licensing process is completed, the nuclear repository likely will be the most thoroughly studied engineering project in history.

Absent any valid technical reasons to stop it, progress on the national repository ought to continue without political interference.

So why is Yucca Mountain's completion as a nuclear repository off the table as a site for storing nuclear waste?

To read the complete editorial, visit The Tri-City Herald.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service