Commentary: Voting against health and wellbeing | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Voting against health and wellbeing

James Werrell - The Rock Hill Herald

August 19, 2009 03:21 AM

Ask yourself, what has the health insurance industry done for you lately?

Likely answers include: Denied coverage for treatment or medicine; denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition; dropped coverage because you left or lost your job; raised the cost of coverage.

For most people with insurance, the cost of coverage has gone up substantially. Since 1999, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, average premiums for family coverage have increased 119 percent. Out-of-pocket contributions for workers have more than doubled during the same time period.

Or maybe you are among the 25 million under-insured Americans, holding a policy with deductibles so high that it is useless for the "little" things, like broken bones, strep throat or cuts needing stitches.

That insurance policy purchased on the open market might protect you from being financially ruined by a catastrophic medical problem. Then again, you might go bankrupt anyway. Every 30 seconds, someone in the nation files for bankruptcy because of medical bills.

Of course, questions about coverage are irrelevant if you're among the 45 million Americans without health insurance or one of the 14,000 Americans who lose their health insurance every day. Census estimates indicate that nearly one in five South Carolina residents had no health insurance in 2006. But, according to a recent story in the Charleston Post and Courier, the recession may have pushed that figure closer to one in four.

That means more than 1 million people in South Carolina alone have no insurance. And because residents 65 or older are eligible for Medicare, most of those without insurance are young or middle-aged workers, many of them with children, just trying to scrape by.

Meanwhile, those of us who have insurance must pay higher premiums and higher medical bills to help cover the cost of caring for those who can't afford medical care.

All this adds up to the costliest medical care in the world, by far. America spends 17 percent of its gross domestic product on health care, compared to the average in other industrialized nations of 9.26 percent. Without reforms, health-care spending in the United States could consume 25 percent of GDP by 2025, and 50 percent by 2082.

Those are frightening figures, not to mention economically unsustainable ones. Increasingly, good medical care will be a privilege available only to the wealthy — unless we change the system.

We often hear that Americans vote according to how their pocketbooks are affected. But in the debate over health care reform, many of those who oppose reforms, particularly the so-called "public plan," are siding with the gargantuan medical industry against their own best interests.

Perhaps that isn't surprising in light of the fact that health care firms and their lobbies are spending about $1.5 million a day to fight reforms. We should ask ourselves why the medical industry is going to such great lengths to maintain the status quo.

Much of the anti-reform campaign consists of a sleazy disinformation blitz to convince Americans that the government wants to take over health care and mandate euthanasia for the elderly. In actuality, the government-run public plan would be a lifeline for millions of Americans who can't afford insurance and, coincidentally, a boon to thousands of small businesses that can't afford to provide insurance for their employees.

The public plan also would compete with private providers and help keep them honest. Meanwhile, those with policies they like would be able to keep them.

It is sad to watch as more and more gullible people are conned by the lobbyists or the fake grass-roots organizers funded by the industry, such as the Campaign for an American Solution. These so-called advocacy groups are busy disrupting community forums across the nation because they would lose an honest and open debate.

But that is a debate we, as a nation, need to have. With little time left before elected officials return to Congress from their August break, we need to insist on a fair hearing for reforms.

This may be the last chance for a generation to address the crying need for comprehensive health care reform. Here's hoping Congress and the American people don't blow it.

ABOUT THE WRITER

James Werrell is the Rock Hill Herald opinion page editor. He can be reached at jwerrell@heraldonline.com.

Related stories from McClatchy DC

HOMEPAGE

More columns by James Werrell at The Rock Hill Herald

February 13, 2009 12:17 PM

Read Next

Opinion

A preview of 2019 and a few New Year’s resolutions for Trump and Pelosi

By Andrew Malcolm Special to McClatchy

January 02, 2019 06:00 AM

The president might resolve to keep his mouth shut some and silencing his cellphone more this year. Pelosi too could work on her public speaking and maybe use notes a bit more to remind of the subject at hand.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The West has long militarized space. China plans to weaponize it. Not good.

December 27, 2018 04:52 PM

Opinion

Trump’s artless deal: The president’s Syria decision will have long-term consequences

December 26, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service