Commentary: Confirming Judge Hamilton for the Seventh Circuit | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Confirming Judge Hamilton for the Seventh Circuit

Carl Tobias - Special to McClatchy Newspapers

November 16, 2009 01:59 PM

When Barack Obama became President in January, the United States Courts of Appeals experienced openings in fourteen of their 179 judgeships. The new administration realized that swiftly filling these openings was critical and applied specific measures to facilitate appointments, vowing to end the "confirmation wars" that have plagued selection.

Thus, President Obama exercised special care to insure that his first nominee, U.S. District Judge David Hamilton of Indiana, was extremely qualified. Despite these efforts, numerous Senate Republicans have opposed Judge Hamilton.

Because the jurist is intelligent, ethical, diligent and independent and has balanced temperament the Senate must confirm Judge Hamilton on Tuesday, as this date is the eight-month anniversary of his nomination.

The Seventh Circuit, which resolves 99 percent of appeals from Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin, requires all eleven of its authorized judgeships to promptly, inexpensively and fairly resolve cases. For instance, the tribunal now provides the largest percentages of oral arguments and published opinions, which are crucial measures of appellate justice, but are very resource intensive.

Obama has invoked a few practices to swiftly fill the Seventh Circuit vacancy left by Judge Kenneth Ripple's assumption of senior status.

The Chief Executive promptly consulted the home-state senators before making an official nomination. Obama sought the advice of Evan Bayh (D) and Richard Lugar (R), who strongly backed Judge Hamilton. Obama nominated the jurist on March 17, while he received an April 1 hearing.

When Republicans asserted that rapid scheduling left them insufficient preparation time, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the Judiciary Committee chair, quickly arranged a second hearing for April 29. The Judiciary Committee approved Hamilton 12-7 on June 4. Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the Majority Leader, scheduled the jurist's floor debate and vote for Tuesday by filing a cloture motion nearly a half year after the panel had approved him.

The White House chose Judge Hamilton as the initial nominee because he had compiled an excellent record as a U.S. District Judge. The ABA assigned the jurist its highest rating, well qualified. The President of the Indianapolis chapter of the Federalist Society praised the nomination: "I regard Judge Hamilton as an excellent jurist with a first rate intellect."

Nonetheless, Republicans strongly criticized Judge Hamilton.

For instance, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the ranking Judiciary Committee member, claimed that "President Obama chose to set an aggressive tone by nominating Judge David Hamilton, a former board member and vice president for litigation of the Indiana chapter of the ACLU, as his first nominee."

Moreover, Sessions, observed his "nomination is clearly controversial," contending that Hamilton has "drive[n] a political agenda," embracing the "empathy standard [and] the idea of a living Constitution." Representation of, or membership in, groups, such as the ACLU and the Federalist Society, or issuance of some opinions with which senators disagree should not be automatic disqualifiers for selection or confirmation.

Judge Hamilton's distinguished record of service on the federal bench means that the Senate should confirm him today. Filling Judge Ripple's seat is important because the Seventh Circuit needs all of its members to deliver appellate justice.

ABOUT THE WRITER

Carl Tobias is the Williams Professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service