Commentary: Senate filibusters need to be broken | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Senate filibusters need to be broken

The Sacramento Bee

December 22, 2009 11:23 AM

Looking for a culprit in the Senate health care bill that keeps getting watered down and loaded up with ugly amendments?

Arcane Senate Rule 22, known as the filibuster, is not in the Constitution. It's an internal rule requiring 60 of 100 senators to vote to end debate before moving to a majority vote on a bill.

Ideally, the filibuster is supposed to assure deliberation and prevent arbitrary action by a 51-vote majority. Unfortunately, it has morphed into a way for a minority to kill bills ("do nothing, and do it slowly"). It is also used by individual senators to extort special favors (creating "Christmas tree" bills, with holdout senators hanging their own "ornaments" before they'll agree to end debate).

And where senators in the past would have to actually stand on the floor all day and all night to keep debate going, Senate practice recently has allowed psuedo-filibusters – the mere threat of a filibuster – to force the majority to assemble 60 votes to move legislation.

In the health care bill, Republicans are using the threat of a filibuster in hopes of killing the effort. And a handful of Democratic senators are using it to win concessions. So to get landmark health care legislation passed, the Senate majority faces a difficult choice.

It could force the minority to stage a real filibuster – making senators stay on the floor, if necessary using the sergeant-at-arms to enforce a quorum.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Sacramento Bee.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service