Commentary: A little inconvenience is worth it for security | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: A little inconvenience is worth it for security

The Anchorage Daily News

January 05, 2010 02:28 PM

The Christmas Day close call aboard an international flight bound for Detroit made clear that U.S. and the world's airways remain vulnerable to terrorists.

We need to use all the means we have — with professionalism and good judgment — to counter the threat.

That means using both full body scans of passengers and agents trained to look for characteristics or behavior that fits a profile of potential terrorists.

Both methods have the potential for abuse. That potential can be minimized with strict rules having the force of law and high professional standards for those who protect the flying public and the security of the nation.

The Transportation Security Administration has been using the full body scans at selected airports around the United States for about two years. The imaging devices are "virtual strip searches," which reveal a good deal more of a person's body than privacy generally allows. But they are anonymous; those who look at the images are in a separate room from those guiding passengers through the devices at security.

The notion of a detailed look at our body images, even images that resemble a clinical X-ray in quality, makes many Americans uncomfortable. At the same time, some passengers have said they prefer the anonymity of the machines to the alternative, a pat-down search by a TSA staffer. Current policy allows a passenger pulled out for a search the choice of one or the other.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Anchorage Daily News.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service