Commentary: Supreme Court opens floodgates for corporate, union money | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Supreme Court opens floodgates for corporate, union money

The Anchorage Daily News

January 25, 2010 10:59 AM

If you think corporations and unions already have disproportionate power in American politics, brace yourself — it's going to get worse. A lot worse. Thanks to last week's radical ruling by the five "conservative" members of the U.S. Supreme Court, corporations and unions can now spend unlimited amounts of money to elect or defeat political candidates.

No longer will special interests have to raise money through voluntary contributions made specifically for political purposes. They'll be able to take money collected from customers, government contracts, or union members and use it to help political friends and punish political foes.

The five justices threw out a 60-year-old federal ban on corporations and unions running campaigns for or against candidates. In the process, the five reached for a result none of the parties asked for and they overturned two previous Supreme Court rulings, including one from just seven years ago.

The ruling is a textbook example of "judicial activism" by justices who regularly argue for "judicial restraint."

From the ruling, it's unclear how the government can legally ban foreign interests, like the Chinese government, Mexican drug lords or Russian oligarchs, from creating U.S. corporations so they can spend millions of dollars to influence our elections.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.adn.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service