Commentary: Is NAS water review legit? | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Is NAS water review legit?

The Sacramento Bee

January 25, 2010 01:19 PM

Starting Sunday at UC Davis, the National Academy of Sciences will begin five days of hearings on federal water pumping restrictions aimed at protecting fish in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.

Given the academy's stature and reputation, we can't help but say "welcome" to all the scientists on the panel. That said, there are real questions about this review. Is it warranted on scientific grounds? Or is it just an effort by an influential U.S. senator to shore up her support among farmers in the San Joaquin Valley?

At issue are federal wildlife regulations that seek to protect steelhead, sturgeon, Delta smelt and two runs of salmon. At certain times of the year, the regulations set limits on reservoir operations and water diversions so fish aren't sucked into the Delta's water pumps. In the fall, the rules require more outflow through the Delta.

So far, two separate scientific panels have affirmed the importance of fall flows for the smelt. Yet farmers near Fresno, who have lost irrigation supplies to such rules, claim they are based on bogus science. And they have Sen. Dianne Feinstein on their side.

In September, the wealthy owner of Paramount Farms, Stewart Resnick, asked Feinstein for an outside scientific review. Feinstein, who has received significant campaign contributions from Resnick and other farmers over the years, readily complied.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.sacbee.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service