Commentary: Alaska Game Board should err on side of caution in banning animals | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Alaska Game Board should err on side of caution in banning animals

The Anchorage Daily News

February 02, 2010 11:09 AM

Owners or would-be owners of exotic pets want the Alaska Board of Game to put more creatures on the "clean list" of animals that Alaskans can legally own. The board's response should start with "no."

That doesn't mean that all requests be denied without consideration. But the prevailing policies of the departments of Fish and Game and Environmental Conservation are wise.

"We're just really conservative and concerned about this," state biologist Rick Sinnott said. "So we generally try to hold the line on these things."

Exotic pets are nothing new in Alaska. From the bearded dragon that provides lessons about lizards in preschool classrooms to the black scorpion that better not be a Christmas stocking stuffer, Alaskans have owned all sorts of pets not native to the country.

In many cases, they pose little threat, and if even if they escape, they can't survive the northern habitat. Nature often provides its own defenses.

But there may be risks -- of the spreading of diseases, of mistreatment or abandonment of the animals when the novelty wears off, and even of introduction of species that could upset local ecologies. One proponent of changes argued that if an individual is willing to shell out thousands of dollars for a Capuchin monkey or a hybrid cat, that's their business and not the state's.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.adn.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service