Commentary: Maybe 'don't ask, don't tell' should just be 'don't ask' | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Maybe 'don't ask, don't tell' should just be 'don't ask'

The Anchorage Daily News

February 15, 2010 10:40 AM

President Barack Obama wants to change the law to allow gay Americans to serve openly in the U.S. armed forces. He's got the support of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, his secretary of defense and retired Gen. Colin Powell. But the military is divided on the issue and it remains unresolved and volatile. Here are three thoughts on the subject:

• Cut the current policy down to "don't ask."



Gay Americans serve now. Current law imposes a "don't ask, don't tell" standard on their service. If gays do come out, or if someone outs them, they face discharge from the service, no matter how well or how long they've served. They can follow the "don't ask, don't tell" policy to a T but if someone even inadvertently discovers they are gay, they can be discharged. About 10,900 members of the armed forces have been discharged under the law.

Soldiers can serve this country with distinction, invest years of sweat and blood, and have the string pulled on them even if they make every effort to follow Uncle Sam's rules because someone discovered they are gay. That's just wrong.

So why not make sexual orientation officially a non-issue in the military? Basically, it shouldn't be anybody's business.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.adn.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service