Commentary: No judge is above the law | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: No judge is above the law

The Sacramento Bee

February 17, 2010 12:16 PM

Justice may be blind, but the commission in charge of disciplining California's judges should have its eyes wide open when a jurist shows up on its docket more than once.

Because judges wield such enormous power, it is no trifling matter when they stand accused of abusing their authority. And since it is exceedingly rare for them to be formally investigated, it is very troubling that two local jurists — Placer Superior Court Judge Joseph W. O'Flaherty and Sacramento Superior Court Judge Peter J. McBrien — have been in the dock twice.

Over the last decade, the state Commission on Judicial Performance has fielded an average of 982 complaints a year. Almost all are summarily dismissed because there's no evidence of anything fishy; there have been only 34 formal proceedings in that time. If the commission finds misconduct, it can issue a private admonishment, a public admonishment or censure, and in the most egregious cases it can sack a judge — done only two dozen times.

The commission considers previous misconduct, and its director says there has never been a judge censured more than once who has not been removed. But even without a prior censure, repeat offenders deserve special attention.

Last week, the commission announced formal proceedings against O'Flaherty, who joined the Superior Court bench in 1998.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.sacbee.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service