Commentary: Alaska's cruise ship tax looks fair | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Alaska's cruise ship tax looks fair

The Anchorage Daily News

April 23, 2010 11:51 AM

More Alaska ports — especially Juneau and Ketchikan — will have money for major harbor and dock projects from the cruise ship passenger tax. The cruise industry will get a reduction in that tax — but not until 2011, allowing the state to collect at the current rate of $46 a head this year, worth $39 million. The final deal on the cruise ship tax turned the bill into a boon for Ketchikan and Juneau, which now will collect not only their own head taxes, but $5 from the state as well. That should cover their waterfront needs in accommodating the cruise industry.

Five other cruise ports will share in the state's take at $5 a head, their totals depending on the number of passengers who call.

Senate Bill 312 gives the cruise industry some of what it wanted and keeps a decent tax take for Alaska's ports, with the busiest rightly getting the largest share. The bill clarifies that the money collected is to be used within shouting distance of the waterfront, as federal law requires. The bill keeps intact the principle established by the 2006 cruise ship initiative that Alaska can and will require a profitable industry to pay its way here and protect our environment.

At the same time, the bill eases the tax burden to encourage the cruise industry to restore and increase Alaska cruise traffic, which makes up most of the tourism industry here.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.adn.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service