Commentary: ANWR's coastal plain should stay in play for oil | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: ANWR's coastal plain should stay in play for oil

The Anchorage Daily News

May 11, 2010 12:07 PM

The coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be open to careful oil and gas exploration. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has heard considerable testimony in favor of wilderness designation for the coastal plain, also known as the 1002 area. If adopted, wilderness status would put the coastal plain permanently off limits.

That's the wrong choice.

Why? The coastal plain likely contains anywhere from 6 billion to 16 billion barrels of recoverable oil and trillions of cubic feet of natural gas.

For Alaska's economy, the gain is obvious. We'd keep exploration and development going, keep the trans-Alaska pipeline operating at high capacity, provide jobs, maintain the state treasury for public services like education and continue healthy deposits into the Permanent Fund, our long-term savings account.

For the nation, production from ANWR would mean more of our oil would come from domestic sources. Producing more of our own energy from all sources is a national priority with bipartisan support. In this context, ANWR makes sense if we pursue a national strategy that makes the most of our fossil fuel reserves while in the long term reducing our dependence on all oil, foreign and domestic. Otherwise we'll just burn our way back to a dangerous dependence.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.adn.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service