Commentary: I'm more 'pro-life' than my opponent | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: I'm more 'pro-life' than my opponent

The Wichita Eagle

July 21, 2010 01:31 PM

Because the Republicans most likely to vote in an August primary are those with the most conservative views, it's not enough for GOP candidates to be "pro-life" anymore. It follows that most of the Republican candidates are trying to prove themselves uniquely worthy of the coveted pro-life vote.

But in the 4th Congressional District's GOP primary, front-runners Mike Pompeo and Wink Hartman hold positions that would crumble at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Pompeo, who won Kansans for Life's endorsement, opposes abortion except when necessary to save a woman's life.

Hartman goes further, opposing abortion across the board as well as birth-control pills, morning-after pills, intra-uterine devices and even saying of condom use — "I don't like it, but I can live with it."

While many Kansans check a calendar to make sure it's still 2010, both candidates should check the multiple Supreme Court decisions on abortion.

In Roe v. Wade and since, the court has made it clear that states cannot limit a woman's right to abortion before fetal viability and must allow abortion after viability (the 23rd or 24th week of pregnancy) to preserve a woman's life or health, including her mental health.

Until the court decides otherwise, candidates' talk of stricter limits is just pandering.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Wichita Eagle.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service