Commentary: Murkowski, Begich should show the way on oil-spill legislation compromise | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Murkowski, Begich should show the way on oil-spill legislation compromise

The Anchorage Daily News

August 09, 2010 11:05 AM

Last week we wrote about the political and ideological divisions that were keeping the United States — particularly the U.S. Senate — from progress toward a national energy policy.

By the end of the week, we had examples from Alaska's two U.S. senators of how that might change.

Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski welcomed compromise oil-spill legislation from Sen. Mark Begich and another bill from Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana. Both are Democrats.

All three senators were opposed to the unlimited oil spill liability legislation the Democratic majority backed and then dropped last week.

Both Murkowski and Begich want to make sure that any oil-spill liability legislation does not drive smaller operators out of the Gulf of Mexico or Alaska. To that end, they both want to raise the current $75 million liability to $250 million. Beyond that, they want to establish a multibillion-dollar pool guaranteed by all operators to cover liability. The goal would be to cover the damages of any spill without leaving American taxpayers on the hook for them.

Three caveats: One, there is no such thing as a guarantee that taxpayers -- or taxpayers in their role as consumers -- won't pay. But the legislation does demand payment from the companies responsible.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.adn.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service