Commentary: Walker's Prop. 8 decision was the correct one | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Walker's Prop. 8 decision was the correct one

The Sacramento Bee

August 13, 2010 12:55 PM

Federal Judge Vaughn R. Walker made the right call Thursday by lifting a stay on his ruling that Proposition 8 — the initiative that bans same-sex marriage in California — is unconstitutional.

If you believe that Proposition 8 violates the rights of an individual group — as Walker ruled on Aug. 4 — then it makes little sense to perpetuate the violation of those rights. By lifting his stay, Walker creates the opportunity for gay and lesbian couples to resume marriages after Aug. 18.

Whether or not there will be lines at the courthouse steps remains to be seen. Proponents of Proposition 8 say they will seek an immediate stay from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. If need be, they have vowed to go to the U.S. Supreme Court to obtain a permanent stay pending appeal.

Even among some supporters of same-sex marriages, there is ambivalence about letting the wedding bells chime while the legal system continues to review the constitutionality of Proposition 8. Some argue it would be cruel for same-sex couples to marry, only to find their unions thrown into doubt by a future decision in favor of Proposition 8.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.sacbee.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service