Commentary: Washington's 'soda tax' should be repealed | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Washington's 'soda tax' should be repealed

The Tri-City Herald

October 15, 2010 02:20 PM

The Legislature plugged a budget hole last year with chewing gum. It's not a good fix.

A tax on candy and soda might make sense if the money were targeted to fight obesity or even dedicated to education.

This tax does neither.

It all goes into the general fund.

While some compare it to a sin tax, it really doesn't fit the definition. It doesn't discourage the sin (in this case obesity), and the funds aren't targeted to any remedy.

As a society, we know we're fat.

We also know eating a candy bar doesn't help. But under the new tax code, a Snickers bar is taxed and a Twix bar isn't. Your tastebuds think they're both candy, but the state says they're not.

Another -- probably unintended -- consequence of this legislation is that it hurts some Washington businesses by increasing the business and occupation taxes for certain food processors.

Even though this is a tax issue, it's not really about money. People who can afford to buy bottled water can likely afford to pay a couple of extra cents on that water. The same thing for a candy bar or can of soda.

But this tax extends beyond the candy aisle of your grocery store. And it's a hit-and-miss coverage of the things it intends to tax.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.tri-cityherald.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service