Commentary: New START pact hasn't been a rush to judgment | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: New START pact hasn't been a rush to judgment

The Sacramento Bee

November 29, 2010 11:24 AM

President Ronald Reagan hastened the end of the Cold War and launched a new era of U.S.-led nuclear diplomacy with the former Soviet Union.

Presidents Reagan, George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush negotiated, and the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly ratified (93-5, 93-6 and 95-0), three nuclear-arms-control treaties with Moscow. Those treaties have reduced deployed nuclear weapons from 12,000 in each country to 2,200, making the world a safer place.

So now we come to the next step – reducing nuclear weapons arsenals from 2,200 to 1,550.

The Senate should have ratified the New START pact before Labor Day, but now it is languishing. Republicans, backtracking from their legacy of arms-control achievement, are allowing one senator to block the treaty.

President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed the treaty in April. Senate ratification is urgent because the original START pact expired almost a year ago – so U.S. inspectors haven't been visiting Russian facilities. Delays in re- establishing an inspection-and-monitoring system mean leaving so-called "loose nukes" throughout the former Soviet Union.

Since April, the Senate has held 12 hearings. It examined the text and technical annexes. It has reviewed a National Intelligence Estimate, a State Department report on verifiability and an analysis of Russian compliance with past arms-control treaties. Senators got answers to more than 900 questions.

This has been no rush to judgment.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.sacbee.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service