Commentary: Kentucky gets low marks from Brady Campaign | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Kentucky gets low marks from Brady Campaign

The Lexington Herald-Leader

January 11, 2011 12:48 PM

It would be just as easy for a mentally troubled young person, someone who had been rejected by the Army and banned from his community college, to walk out of a gun store with a semi-automatic handgun and a 30-round clip of bullets in Kentucky as it was in Arizona.

Both Kentucky and Arizona scored 2 out of 100 possible points on the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence's scorecard in 2009.

Since then, Arizona outdid Kentucky by becoming the third state to allow the carrying of concealed weapons without a permit.

The only points that Kentucky and Arizona scored in the 2009 survey (www.bradycampaign.org/stategunlaws/scorecard) were for not forcing colleges to allow firearms on their campuses. The highest scoring states were California and New Jersey with 79 and 73 points respectively.

The 22-year-old who is accused of killing six people and wounding 14, including U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, legally purchased his Glock 19 9mm semi-automatic pistol at a Sportsman's Warehouse. He passed the instant background check required by federal law.

Until 2004, he would not have been able to purchase the high-capacity ammunition magazine because it was illegal under a federal ban on assault weapons. (That means he could have gotten off just 10 shots without reloading, according to a Brady Campaign statement, instead of the at least 20 shots he fired outside a Tuscon Safeway on Saturday morning.) Congress failed to renew the assault-weapon ban in 2004.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.kentucky.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service