Commentary: Health insurers need to be regulated | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
Sign In
Sign In
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

You have viewed all your free articles this month

Subscribe

Or subscribe with your Google account and let Google manage your subscription.

Opinion

Commentary: Health insurers need to be regulated

The Sacramento Bee

April 11, 2011 11:32 AM

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein has done yeoman duty exposing excessive health insurance premiums — and pressing for legislation boosting state and federal authority to deny, modify or block "excessive, unjustified, or unfairly discriminatory" rate increases.

This is not about capping premiums or imposing price controls. Still, the health insurance industry is fighting rate regulation, all beak and talons, biting and scratching. At the federal level, insurers argue that insurance regulation is a state activity. But now that states are acting, they argue that the federal government has taken care of things.

Action is needed at the state and federal levels.

Thirty-three states require prior approval of health insurance rates. California is not one of them. This state's insurance commissioner may only ask insurers, pretty please with sugar on top, to delay or reduce proposed premium increases. The result is isolated, informal action.

Remember Anthem Blue Cross, the WellPoint subsidiary? It became infamous early last year for sending notices to 800,000 Californians, announcing rate increases of up to 39 percent. After an independent analysis found "numerous and substantial errors," Anthem backed off – temporarily.

Finally, the company reduced the average rate increase to 9.1 percent for 600,000 policyholders, and delayed it until July 1. But nearly 151,000 individual policyholders still face rate hikes of as much as 26 percent on May 1.

Consumers deserve better than sporadic action that ultimately relies on the whim of the insurer.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.sacbee.com.

Read Next

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

By Markos Kounalakis

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Orthodox Christian religious leaders worldwide are weakening an important institution that gave the Russian president outsize power and legitimacy.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush, Pearl Harbor and America’s other fallen

December 07, 2018 03:42 AM

Opinion

George H.W. Bush’s secret legacy: his little-known kind gestures to many

December 04, 2018 06:00 AM

Opinion

Nicaragua’s ‘House of Cards’ stars another corrupt and powerful couple

November 29, 2018 07:50 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service